Kevin McMahon


Blog Search

Alt.Net Seattle Recap

I spent last weekend at the Alt.Net Seattle conference and had some time to reflect on it. This was my first experience with an open spaces style conference, and I have to admit that I am a big fan of the format. While I am not convinced this format would work for every type of gathering, it fit the needs of this type of group very well.

There was a lot made during a couple of sessions about being more accessible, newbie-friendly, and encouraging more new faces and ideas at these events. If you watch some of Scott Hanselman’s Why So Mean session, you can get the general gist of some of the problems and solutions offered. While I think introspection is generally a good thing, I am not convinced that any progress on this front will be made, and question if these issues are as bad as some may think. As a first-time Alt.Net conference attendee and having met one other person there in real-life before last weekend, I never felt unwelcome or shunned, and everyone that I talked to was cordial and friendly and definitely open to discussion.

However, I didn’t get on a plane to Seattle to talk about feelings. The primary attraction to the event was to discuss building software with some of the most passionate and opinionated developers in the world. By participating in the workshops and sessions, I was able to soak up and join conversations about may topics, including agile and lean, LINQ, DDD, and context/spec-based testing. These are topics that I don’t always have the opportunity to discuss daily and certainly not with people who have the kind of expertise as those at the event. I’ve already been able to apply at work and on my side projects some of the things I’ve picked up, and I don’t think I’m close to truly synthesizing all of the great conversations that I had.

While my overall experience was positive, I did feel like there were some minuses from the trip. Some of the sessions turned out to be mostly one-way presentations that spurred little discussion or participation. I suspect that may be attributed to an overall lack of experience with the topic. Sessions like Miguel de Icaza’s on Mono and the iPhone fell into that category since virtually no one there had any experience with developing for the iPhone and even fewer with Mono. Still, even discussions about more universal topics like DDD or Agile were somewhat “eyes forward” and lacked the interaction and engagement that made other sessions notable.

A cooling factor on some discussions may have been the result of deference to a few of the more forceful personalities or undisputed domain experts in the field. The presence of some of these personalities in the sessions clearly defined or dramatically shifted the discussions. It did not take me long to learn and apply the law of two feet when I found myself at the same sessions as some of these people. I knew that it was a matter of time until the session’s conversation was going to degrade or grind to a halt. My last quibble with the conference resulted from the facilitator-led, new-age ceremony elements. I don’t think the butterfly and bumblebee metaphor stuff or the ringing of the bell really added to the experience and was not needed. I know that the facilitators were trying to make this a very Zen-like experience, but it was not. In terms of key takeaways, I think I’ve identified a few. I talked with quite a few people about their experiences with agile and scrum. In hearing some other companies’ practices and problems, I was comforted by the knowledge that my current company is not as dysfunctional as I thought. While I believe we can improve, I also realized that I should probably take a moment to appreciate the good things that we do and celebrate the stuff that works well. The other takeaway was that I feel like I am in a much better position to clearly articulate the goals that I had set for myself earlier this year. Before this weekend, I had not done an excellent job articulating some of these goals and had yet to express them in SMART terms. Now I am going to incorporate things like contributions to open source projects, community demos, and presentations into my goals. The future of these conferences will be in the local or region open spaces starting to be held. Already events are planned for Vancouver and Houston that seem to fit this bill because they are drawing in people from the region versus nationally based on a quick perusal of their attendee list. I speculate that if you reduce the concentration of some of the more well-known personalities in the community, you might be able to make up for any potential loss of expertise with an increase in the amount of active participation from fresh new faces. Additionally, I think some might find the benefits of participating in open discussions with developers in their own communities more meaningful as these types of interactions may yield long-term benefits.

Lastly, I’d like to thank the people of the Alt.Net Seattle group for putting this together, and you should be proud of the success the conference achieved. Job well done.